Update `performance` block in README
This commit is contained in:
parent
b61fdec326
commit
8f387a74c9
10
README.md
10
README.md
|
@ -220,11 +220,11 @@ end
|
|||
|
||||
## Performance
|
||||
|
||||
Performance tests have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with Rabl 0.9 and Rabl-rails 0.2.0
|
||||
Benchmarks have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with rabl 0.6.14 and rabl-rails 0.1.0
|
||||
|
||||
Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 15% less memory**.
|
||||
Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 10% less memory**.
|
||||
|
||||
You can see full tests and graphic on the benchmark application repository.
|
||||
You can see full tests on test application repository.
|
||||
|
||||
## Caching
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -232,8 +232,6 @@ Caching is not a part of Rabl-rails. It is already in Rails itself, because cach
|
|||
|
||||
And caching each object in a collection can be really not effective with big collections or simple objects. This is also a nightmare with cache expiration.
|
||||
|
||||
## Resources
|
||||
|
||||
## Authors and contributors
|
||||
|
||||
* [Christopher Cocchi-Perrier](http://github.com/ccocchi) - Creator of the project
|
||||
|
@ -244,6 +242,6 @@ Want to make another change ? Just fork and contribute, any help is very much ap
|
|||
|
||||
## Original idea
|
||||
|
||||
* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem is used a lot before deciding I wanted faster views
|
||||
* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem. I used it a lot before deciding I wanted faster views
|
||||
|
||||
## Copyright
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue