From 8f387a74c9f2e193784ed3ace23a6d32f8c28994 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christopher Cocchi-Perrier Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:22:27 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Update `performance` block in README --- README.md | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 6843d66..4bbc517 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -220,11 +220,11 @@ end ## Performance -Performance tests have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with Rabl 0.9 and Rabl-rails 0.2.0 +Benchmarks have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with rabl 0.6.14 and rabl-rails 0.1.0 -Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 15% less memory**. +Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 10% less memory**. -You can see full tests and graphic on the benchmark application repository. +You can see full tests on test application repository. ## Caching @@ -232,8 +232,6 @@ Caching is not a part of Rabl-rails. It is already in Rails itself, because cach And caching each object in a collection can be really not effective with big collections or simple objects. This is also a nightmare with cache expiration. -## Resources - ## Authors and contributors * [Christopher Cocchi-Perrier](http://github.com/ccocchi) - Creator of the project @@ -244,6 +242,6 @@ Want to make another change ? Just fork and contribute, any help is very much ap ## Original idea -* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem is used a lot before deciding I wanted faster views +* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem. I used it a lot before deciding I wanted faster views ## Copyright