diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 6843d66..4bbc517 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -220,11 +220,11 @@ end
 
 ## Performance
 
-Performance tests have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with Rabl 0.9 and Rabl-rails 0.2.0
+Benchmarks have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with rabl 0.6.14 and rabl-rails 0.1.0
 
-Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 15% less memory**.
+Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 10% less memory**.
 
-You can see full tests and graphic on the benchmark application repository.
+You can see full tests on test application repository.
 
 ## Caching
 
@@ -232,8 +232,6 @@ Caching is not a part of Rabl-rails. It is already in Rails itself, because cach
 
 And caching each object in a collection can be really not effective with big collections or simple objects. This is also a nightmare with cache expiration.
 
-## Resources
-
 ## Authors and contributors
 
 * [Christopher Cocchi-Perrier](http://github.com/ccocchi) - Creator of the project
@@ -244,6 +242,6 @@ Want to make another change ? Just fork and contribute, any help is very much ap
 
 ## Original idea
 
-* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem is used a lot before deciding I wanted faster views
+* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem. I used it a lot before deciding I wanted faster views
 
 ## Copyright