Update `performance` block in README

This commit is contained in:
Christopher Cocchi-Perrier 2012-07-23 19:22:27 +03:00
parent b61fdec326
commit 8f387a74c9
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -220,11 +220,11 @@ end
## Performance ## Performance
Performance tests have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with Rabl 0.9 and Rabl-rails 0.2.0 Benchmarks have been made using this [application](http://github.com/ccocchi/rabl-benchmark), with rabl 0.6.14 and rabl-rails 0.1.0
Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 15% less memory**. Overall, Rabl-rails is **20% faster and use 10% less memory**.
You can see full tests and graphic on the benchmark application repository. You can see full tests on test application repository.
## Caching ## Caching
@ -232,8 +232,6 @@ Caching is not a part of Rabl-rails. It is already in Rails itself, because cach
And caching each object in a collection can be really not effective with big collections or simple objects. This is also a nightmare with cache expiration. And caching each object in a collection can be really not effective with big collections or simple objects. This is also a nightmare with cache expiration.
## Resources
## Authors and contributors ## Authors and contributors
* [Christopher Cocchi-Perrier](http://github.com/ccocchi) - Creator of the project * [Christopher Cocchi-Perrier](http://github.com/ccocchi) - Creator of the project
@ -244,6 +242,6 @@ Want to make another change ? Just fork and contribute, any help is very much ap
## Original idea ## Original idea
* [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem is used a lot before deciding I wanted faster views * [RABL](http://github.com/nesquena/rabl) Standart RABL gem. I used it a lot before deciding I wanted faster views
## Copyright ## Copyright