When developing a gem, Gemfile.lock should not be checked into version control.

For the full rationale, see @wycats excellent article: http://yehudakatz.com/2010/12/16/clarifying-the-roles-of-the-gemspec-and-gemfile/
This commit is contained in:
Tom Ward 2011-08-31 19:12:46 +01:00
parent acd54ab19c
commit 6b6443ab84
2 changed files with 1 additions and 31 deletions

1
.gitignore vendored
View File

@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ pkg/*
*.rbc *.rbc
*.swp *.swp
.bundle .bundle
Gemfile.lock

View File

@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
PATH
remote: .
specs:
guard-rails-assets (0.0.5)
guard
rake
GEM
remote: http://rubygems.org/
specs:
diff-lcs (1.1.2)
guard (0.5.1)
thor (~> 0.14.6)
rake (0.9.2)
rspec (2.6.0)
rspec-core (~> 2.6.0)
rspec-expectations (~> 2.6.0)
rspec-mocks (~> 2.6.0)
rspec-core (2.6.4)
rspec-expectations (2.6.0)
diff-lcs (~> 1.1.2)
rspec-mocks (2.6.0)
thor (0.14.6)
PLATFORMS
ruby
DEPENDENCIES
guard-rails-assets!
rake
rspec